with f(-u,l) = -f(u,l). For u = 0 and l = 0 assume that
¶u f = 0 and ¶3uuuf is small. For small l, identify the leading-order
terms in u and l and obtain an equation for the fixed points of this system in the
vicinity of u = 0. Sketch the various bifurcation diagrams that arise. For ¶3uuuf = 0
the system is said to be at a tricritical point. Why is this point of particular interest if one
wants to discuss hysteretic (jump) transitions?
Trajectories in a Simple Dynamical System
Consider the dynamical system
¶tx
=
-ax - x2,
(2)
¶ty
=
-by
(3)
with b positive.
Determine the solution (x(t),y(t)) of (2,3) and the
trajectory y = y(x) for a > 0.
Determine the solution (x(t),y(t)) of (2,3) and the
trajectory y = y(x) for a = 0.
Compare the trajectories in the two cases. In particular,
comment on the effect of the initial conditions on the trajectories as they approach
the fixed point (0,0).
The case a = 0 demonstrates the non-uniqueness of the center manifold. Comment
on the distance between the different center manifolds and whether they can
be distinguished in a power series expansion around the fixed point (0,0).
Center Manifold Reduction for a Steady Bifurcation
Consider the dynamical system
¶tx
=
y - x3,
(4)
¶ty
=
ax -x3-b
y1+x2
.
(5)
Perform a linear stability analysis of the fixed point (x,y) = (0,0).
Depending on a and b what kind of instabilities can you identify?
Determine the stable, unstable, and center linear eigenspaces in each of the
cases.
Identify the symmetries of the system (4,5).
Based on this information together with the linear stability analysis, what
types of bifurcations do you expect in this system?
For b = 1 and
a small, perform a center manifold reduction to obtain an equation for
a center manifold and an equation for the slow evolution on that manifold.
Keep only the leading-order terms in this expansion.
For b = 1 and
a small, obtain the equivalent result by performing a multiple-scale
calculation. Identify clearly the right and left eigenvectors
of the linear operator (matrix) obtained in the linear stability analysis in (a).
Solve (4,5) numerically (using Matlab/pplane5 or
dstool; see web site) in the regime for which your center manifold reduction
is supposed to be valid. How well does the analytical approach do near the
bifurcation point? (For a quantitative comparison with the center manifold
you would have to write your own code (using ode45, for instance, in matlab) to
be able to print the trajectories.)
Center Manifold Equations for a Hopf Bifurcation
Consider the dynamical system
¶tx
=
-x-y+z2,
(6)
¶ty
=
2x+(1+e) y-z2,
(7)
¶tz
=
x + 2y -z.
(8)
It exhibits a Hopf bifurcation at e = 0 leading to a limit cycle (periodic orbit).
Determine a center manifold that
describes the dynamics of this system for small amplitudes x, y, and z and for
small values of the bifurcation parameter e (which is not necessarily 0).
Determine the evolution equations describing the dynamics on the center manifold.
Express them also in terms of the complex amplitude A = u+iv and compare the resulting
equation with the normal form for a Hopf bifurcation
¶tA = aA + g|A|2 A.
(9)
Is the bifurcation forward or backward (i.e. super- or subcritical)?
Solve the equations numerically (e.g. using dstool or write your own
matlab etc. code). Is the result qualitatively consistent with your analytic
result? Explore what happens to the limit cycle (periodic orbit) when
e is increased.
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 2.60. On 20 Jan 2002, 18:42.